Wczoraj założyłem na tym moim nowym blogu plugin „formy kontaktowej”. Choć ze statystyk wynika, że odwiedziły dotąd mój blog aż trzy osoby, mimo to jestem dobrej myśli. Początki zawsze są trudne. Dziś dostałem pierwszego mejla wysłanego poprzez klik na „Contact”. Treść:
Uprzejmie proszę o komentarz mojego artykułu p.t."Falowa teoria grawitacji".
Wczoraj też zajrzałem do skrzynki kontaktowej na physicsforums. W wyniku tego dostałem do lektury dwie inne prace na temat grawitacji. Jedną w języku rosyjskim, „Esej o naturze grawitacji” (18 stron). Druga w języku angielskim o nowej kwantowej teorii grawitacji (130 stron). Grawitacja się na mnie uwzięła, zapewne w odwecie za moje nią zainteresowania. Inny cios przyszedł ze strony NSF skąd dostałem do recenzji projekt dotyczący …. grawitacji. I jak ja sobie z tym wszystkim dam radę?
Czytam inny esej, fizyka nazwiskiem Besarab Nicolescu p.t. ‘Gurdjieff’s Philosophy of Nature‘.
A tam m.in.:
For Gurdjieff, God was constrained to create the world:
There came to our Creator All-Maintainer the forced need to create our present existing Megalocosmos, i.e., our World.… Our Creator Omnipotent once ascertained that this same Sun Absolute.… was, although almost imperceptibly yet nevertheless gradually, diminishing in volume.… [The] cause of this gradual diminishing of the volume of the Sun Absolute was merely the Heropass, that is, the flow of time itself.33
Such an assertion might appear, at first glance, a manifestation of Gurdjieff’s celebrated humor. But the role attributed to time is intriguing and makes us think of a similar idea which appeared in the cosmology of Jakob Boehme (1575–1624). With Boehme, God also created the universe by constraint—that of his imperious desire to know himself. Thus, he dies to himself in order to be born, by submitting himself to the cycle of time. The “birth of God” is a fundamental aspect of Boehme’s doctrine.
At any rate, to return to Gurdjieff’s view of Creation: it was necessary to save the divine world from the action of time. Thus, the universe was created, an unending chain of systems bound by universal interdependence, which escapes the action of time in this way. Gurdjieff calls this universal interdependence “the Most Great cosmic Trogoautoegocrat.… the true Savior from the law-conformable action of the merciless Heropass,”35 or “the Trogoautoegocratic process.… in order that.… “the exchange of substances” or the “Reciprocal feeding” of everything that exists, might proceed in the Universe and thereby that the merciless “Heropass” might not have its maleficent effect on the Sun Absolute.”36
I tu przypomina mi się, że wczoraj dostałem też email od pewnego inżyniera z Niemiec, którego kolega, fizyk, pracuje nad połączeniem grawitacji z termodynamiką. Zaś inzynier J.H. nadal czeka cierpliwie, aż wyjaśnię problem spadania ciał w ogólnej teorii względności. Tak jakbym ja sam ten problem dobrze rozumiał ….
Nieubłagany czas-Heropass – jak go przechytrzyć?
Nieubłagany czas – Heropass ???
Czy tu nie tkwi błąd ??? I to takim językiem posługuje się ARK ?! Relatywistycznie naganna sprawa !!!
Czystego czasu nie ma!!! Nikt nie widział ani słyszał ani odczuwał [dotykowo…czy też powonieniem…chociaż, gdy ukazywał sie Ojciec PIO to dawało się podobno odczuwać woń fiołków alpejskich / a może dolomickich ? /, a to “ukazywanie” się to
prawdopodobnie jakaś sztuczka GRT-przestrzenno-czasowa ?] c z a s u . CZAS JEST PRZYKLEJONY DO PRZESTRZENI, I ODWROTNIE.
ICH ROZDIELANIE PROWADZI DO PODOBNEGO EFEKTU JAK ODDZIELENIE TLENU OD WODORU W CZÁSTECZKACH WODY -POWSTAJÁ NOWE JAKO§CI !!!
Ja nie należę do Polskiego Towarzystwa Relatywistów [ czy ARK wie,że takowe “zawiązano”… ?],ale maja amatorska
praca nad supełkowo-węzełkowo tkaną grawitacją nie pozwala mi milczeć.Tym bardziej,że zbliża się ceremonia-gauge:
2011-2012…, tzw Sylwester 2011/Mieczysław 2012
Thermogeometrodynamics to nic nowego, zaß J.H. ? Ciekawszy jest Niemiec A.Unzicker…
Science needs creativity and diversity to progress
A Beautiful Mind and Freakonomics are excellent examples of how systems and models in one corner of research can bring new understanding to fields seemingly miles away. Supporting a spectrum of projects and encouraging cross-disciplinary collaborations are not just nice ideas, but necessities for a cutting-edge science program. From the Rising Above the Gathering Storm report:
Increasingly, the most significant new scientific and engineering advances are formed to cut across several disciplines. [emphasis theirs]
2. Scientists need creativity and diversity to progress
Check out the story Masters of Improv from Symmetry Magazine to read about the importance of aspirin and coke cans in experimental particle physics. By nature scientists are creative and curious people who, like artists, should be given reign to explore their ideas. See Female Science Professor’s post on Science and Creativity and Relativity for more.
3. The world needs creativity and diversity to progress
God knows helping people overcome cancer is worthy of all kinds of research – but so is finding alternative energy sources, predicting the path of hurricanes, creating materials that can withstand extreme conditions, understanding biodiversity, global warming, reproduction, drug interactions, AIDS and HIV, population and hunger, nanoscale devices, robotics, and on and on…
4. Small experiments build up the big picture
Finally, let me bring up one other point – experiments are nearly always part of a larger context. Michel Versluis, leader of the team that discovered the cause of the Kaye effect and created the YouTube video, studies
…bubbles and jets in multiphase flow phenomena such as air entrainment, sonoluminescence and cavitation. I am particularly interested in the physics of muliphase flows found in biomedical applications and in biological systems and in the physics of bubbles and jets in granular flow.
It appears that he is not just some “dumbass” who thought “I want to pour shampoo out of a bottle.”
But even if he was – it’s still a cool video.
Read the rest of the post . . .
Posted by spacekendra at 3:36 PM 0 comments Links to this post
Wednesday, June 20, 2007
Bridging Realities: a pendulum and its virtual self
Physicists link a real pendulum to a virtual one in world’s first mixed reality experiment.
People have been linking their identities with online pseudonyms since the beginning of the Internet. Games such as World of Warcraft and Second Life make these identities more tangible, allowing players to create digital avatars to represent themselves.
Avatars can take actions, construct and destroy virtual objects, trade with currency, and travel through virtual worlds in addition to exchanging ideas verbally. Interactions among avatars become more real as headsets allow players to hear other human voices in addition to seeing an animated representation of the person. We all know that the actions of real people control virtual realities, but a recent experiment has shown that a virtual world can affect objects in the material world.
A pendulum.
Vadas Gintautas and Alfred Hübler of the Center for Complex Systems Research at the University of Illinois have been linking the real world a virtual one using that classic physics device, the pendulum. In fact, they just published an article about it in Physical Review E.
While most players enhance or completely transform their appearance when they create an online avatar, Gintautas and Hübler tried to create a virtual pendulum that closely resembled their real one. They put the two pendulums into communication.
Diagram of the pendulum.
The details of this communication are a bit complex, so brace yourself for some vocab. The fixed point is the point from which a pendulum hangs. Don’t be fooled by the word “fixed” – this thing moves around. The angle of the pendulum’s swing is measured as it rotates around this point, and zero means it hangs straight down. Last but not least, the natural frequency of the pendulum is the rate at which it prefers to swing.
That said, the fixed point of the virtual pendulum moves depending on the angle of the real pendulum. Likewise, the angle of the virtual pendulum determines the location of the fixed point of the real pendulum. Moving the fixed point of a pendulum is a method of driving it.
When Gintautas and Hübler made the virtual pendulum, they programmed friction into the system. When the real and virtual pendulums don’t connect, it’s called dual reality. Friction drags them to a stop. When mixed reality occurs, the two pendulums drive one another. Moving as one, they defy the friction forces that would ordinarily halt their swinging. Mixed reality only occurs when the two pendulums have comparable natural frequencies.
It is possible for a real pendulum to become one with its virtual identity, but mixed reality cannot happen with real people and their avatars. While the players exert full control over their online identities, the avatars don’t significantly influence their players. This is probably fortunate for Warcraft players who would prefer not to die with their characters.
Even so, mixed reality may actually prove useful in the real world because it can occur only when the two systems are sufficiently similar. A system with unknown parameters may be synced up to a virtual system whose parameters are set by physicists. The unknown factors in the real system can be determined by changing the virtual system until they shift from dual reality to mixed reality. Then, the physicists will have good estimates for the values of the unknown parameters.
Second Life real estate that players can purchase with their virtual money.
Apart from human identities, World of Warcraft and Second Life intersect the material world economically. US dollars may be used to buy both Second Life linden dollars and Warcraft gold (although, you have to buy gold from other players through sites like Peons4Hire). In the case of the coupled economies, transfers go both ways.
Gintautas and Hübler are curious about the possibility of mixed realities emerging from these coupled economies. After all, if two synced pendulums could overcome friction forces, perhaps synced economies could escape recession.
Picture Credits
Pendulum: Josef Stuefer
Diagram: alpinekat, using the GIMP
Treehouse: Jacob Earl
Read the rest of the post . . .
Posted by alpinekat at 3:14 PM 0 comments Links to this post
The Dimensions of Shadows
In honor of the recent Father’s Day, I’m posting about a debate I once had in the car with my dad. We were talking about shadows and dimensions. Okay, so this is more math, but if you like physics, you must at least have some appreciation for the power of math.
Dad believes that a four-dimensional object could cast a three-dimensional shadow. I was convinced that all shadows must be two dimensional.
In my mind, a shadow is just a two-dimensional map of places where light has passed by or been obstructed by an object. So it must be two dimensional. Wikipedia says that I’m just talking about the cross section of a shadow — they’re all essentially three-dimensional.
It’s hard to imagine a four-dimensional object, though. If I was better at math, maybe I could say something about how photons would interact with it, but I don’t have much of a conceptual idea. Some folks at Union College of New York who are better at math made short animations of the shadows of rotating cubes (3D) and hypercubes (4D, projected in 2D for the picture).
In the animation, each face of the hypercube casts a three-dimensional shadow. So I guess the math supports my dad. It’s really hard to argue with math. But if you have an opinion on the matter, I’d love to read it.
Photo Credits: Wikipedia
Read the rest of the post . . .
Posted by alpinekat at 10:07 AM 9 comments Links to this post
High Speed Safety
Four SPS interns went to Ms. Coffman’s Third Grade Class at Tuckahoe Elementary School on Tuesday, June 19, 2007, for a physics demonstration. Our main topic was speed vs. height using skateboards, a homemade ramp, and boxes. We provided the materials, including Hot Wheels Radar Guns!
The kids measured the maximum speed on the skateboard as it traveled down the ramp at an increasing height. We collected data for a height up to four boxes and then plotted our results. The kids caught on really fast and tried to convince us to let them ride down the ramp on the skateboard to see how fast they could go!
Then, we tied in a safety demo about speed, seatbelts, and bodily damage. The kids made their own Playdoh dolls and took turns sitting them on the skateboard in one of three seats. The first seat had a lap belt and shoulder strap, the middle seat had only a lap belt, and the last one had nothing. The damage assessment was based on tears, loss of limbs, and flying from the car. This was a really big hit with the kids as they determined who suffered the most damage.
After all of the data was plotted, we compared graphs, discussed potential energy vs. kinetic energy, and ways to improve the experiments. The students were very excited about the whole concept and did not seem to realize that they were learning a valuable safety lesson along the way!
For the grand finale, we attempted to launch a couple of Diet Coke and Mentos rockets on skates. One rocket was weighted down with a water bottle, and the kids were encouraged to predict the outcome. The rockets did not travel as far or as smoothly as we would have liked, but the spewing soda was impressive to the students.
Justin and Ryan’s hard work paid off that morning. Besides being informative and exciting, the demo was also a test run for a potential SPS SOCKS experiment. It was a definite success at showing students how to practice proper safety techniques when riding in the car at Hot Wheels Speed!
Read the rest of the post . . .
Posted by Meagans at 9:02 AM 1 comments Links to this post
Monday, June 18, 2007
Physics podcast what?
That’s right, we’re starting a podcast. It’s so new it doesn’t even have intro/ending music (we boycott the term “outro”). So have a listen. It’s about ocean waves, bubbles, sound, and global warming. All that in a minute and thirty-two seconds!
Podcast: Waves and Bubbles
If you want to read more, check out the lay-person’s version of Deane and Stokes’ paper from the 153rd meeting of the Acoustical Society of America. Since 1929.
Photo Credit: NOAA
Read the rest of the post . . .
Posted by alpinekat at 4:26 PM 1 comments Links to this post
Global Warming, Communism, and Arrogance
On the whole I try to stay out of global warming discussions because I’m not well informed about it and don’t have much to offer. With that preamble, let me bring up this comment by Vaclav Klaus, President of the Czech Republic.
As someone who lived under communism for most of his life, I feel obliged to say that I see the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity now in ambitious environmentalism, not in communism. This ideology wants to replace the free and spontaneous evolution of mankind by a sort of central (now global) planning. (read more)
Those are some strong words!
I am reminded of NASA administrator Michael Griffin’s recent controversial comments,
To assume that [global warming] is a problem is to assume that the state of Earth’s climate today is the optimal climate, the best climate that we could have or ever have had and that we need to take steps to make sure that it doesn’t change… I think that’s a rather arrogant position for people to take. (read more)
The two men raise a thought-provoking point that deserves consideration, at least on some level-
What is best for the earth (a constantly evolving and changing entity) may not always be what is best for society (as we know it today).
Hmm…now what does that mean???
Read the rest of the post . . .
Posted by spacekendra at 2:02 PM 7 comments Links to this post
Friday, June 15, 2007
Friday Must Read
I saw this and had to add it to the list…
Baby Monitor Picks up Video from NASA
“Since Sunday, one of the two channels on Natalie Meilinger’s baby monitor has been picking up black-and-white video from inside the space shuttle Atlantis. The other still lets her keep an eye on her baby.”
Read the rest of the post . . .
Posted by spacekendra at 3:53 PM 1 comments Links to this post
Friday Reads
Physicists Discover “Triple-scoop” Baryon
“Physicists of the DZero experiment at the Department of Energy’s Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory have discovered a new heavy particle…approximately six times the proton mass.”
Liquid Lens Can Magnify at the Flick of a Switch
“The first liquid camera lens with no moving parts, and that can switch between two levels of magnification, has been designed by a German research team…”
Driver Ticketed for Using Biofuel
“Teixeira is one of a growing number of fuel-it-yourselfers — backyard brewers who recycle restaurant grease or make moonshine for their car tanks. They do it to save money, reduce pollution or thumb their noses at oil sheiks.”
Plants can Recognize and Prefer Their Kin
“The apparently passive garden plant is not as easy-going as people assume, at least not with strangers. Researchers at McMaster University have found that plants become competitive when forced to share a pot with strangers of the same species, but they are more friendly when potted with their siblings.”
Mystery Solved: Mars Had Large Oceans
“‘This really confirms that there was an ocean on Mars,’ said Mark Richards, a planetary scientist at the University of California at Berkeley and co-author of the study…”
Read the rest of the post . . .
Posted by spacekendra at 3:09 PM 0 comments Links to this post
Thursday, June 14, 2007
Space Origami
I’m a fan of origami. Call me simple-minded, but there is something satisfying about starting with a flat square of paper and ending up with an adorable stocking (they made great gift tags!) or a pretty flower.
But origami isn’t just for stockings and flowers anymore. NASA scientists have recently joined a Tokyo Metropolitan University group in working on an origami-based method for unrolling tethers in space.
Tethers are used in space like child harnesses are used at amusement parks – they keep a child (satellite) in orbit around the parent (space shuttle), no matter what direction the child tries to go in.
The Japanese team has designed a deployer that uses reverse origami – the tether starts out folded and unfolds into a nearly straight line as the top is pulled. At least that’s the theory. There are many details left to work out before the deployer is launched in a proof of concept experiment (set for 2009).
In addition to the details of the deployment method, there is some interesting physics that needs to be worked out. NASA researchers were brought in specifically to help the Japanese team figure out how the tether will respond to the Earth’s magnetic field (since moving a wire in a magnetic field creates current). They’re also investigating how to use the tether for propulsion.
Read the rest of the post . . .
Posted by spacekendra at 11:05 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Wednesday, June 13, 2007
Preview the Big Bang Theory
I came across the trailer for the Big Bang Theory sitcom today. Looks worse than I expected.
Big Bang Theory was one of the most highly sought-after comedies at this year’s LA Screenings, and we are excited to be partnering with C4 in the UK for the premiere of this funny and insightful mass-appeal series that will play to all demographics.
-Jeffrey R Schlesinger from Warmer Bros, quoted in Chortle
This can’t be good.
Read the rest of the post . . .
Posted by spacekendra at 9:55 AM 6 comments Links to this post
Friday, June 08, 2007
Serenading Paper?
Get working on your cheesy rhymes because there may be a new market for jingle writers soon.
Researchers at the University of Sweden are using conductive ink to make sound-producing paper that responds to touch. The prototypes are billboards made entirely of paper that play music or dialogue depending on where you touch them. Watch the video
The applications are endless – commercial packaging, music sampling in record stores, aides for the blind and visual impaired, interactive books…
Right now this technology exists only for large-scale objects like billboards, but the researchers are scaling it down. A New Scientist Tech article quotes Mikael Gulliksson, lead researcher, as saying,
We are interested in scaling the technology down to produce interactive packaging for products like chocolates.
Yum, chocolate. Maybe next Valentines Day I’ll get a box of Swedish chocolates that can serenade me…
The boards are created in three layers – a base made from sturdy cardboard, a middle layer screen-printed with conductive ink, and a top layer printed with the billboard design.
All of the information is digitally embedded in the paper and the touch sensors and speakers are printed directly on the middle layer. The middle layer is connected to a power supply and some microelectronics which enable the user to play, pause, and rewind the sounds as shown in the video.
I think this is great stuff. I am seriously worried, though, that if this technology becomes common every time my roommate pours food for her cat I’ll have to hear the meow mix.
Read the rest of the post . . .
Posted by spacekendra at 9:40 AM 2 comments Links to this post
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
Carbon Cages Shorten Lifespans
If you take carbon atoms and arrange a sheet of them in a hexagonal pattern, you’ll make graphite. If you intersperse your hexagons with pentagons, much like a soccer ball, you’ll make a hollow sphere known as a buckyball. The shape requires 60 carbon atoms, hence the symbol C60.
First time I ever heard that term was from an Australian physics professor, and I thought it was an Aussie term for a soccer ball…turns out the molecule is named for Richard Buckminster Fuller, discoverer of hollow carbon microstructures known as fullerenes.
Anyway, so we have these buckyballs. What to do with them? Well, some physicists have been using them as cages for their pet beryllium-7 atoms. A recent experiment by Japanese physicists, led by T. Ohtsuki, shows that beryllium-7 lasts longer when it is around other beryllium-7 atoms than when it is isolated in a buckyball.a
7Be is a radioactive isotope of beryllium. Radioactive nuclei decay by catching or releasing particles and becoming other nuclei in the process. 7Be decays by snatching one of its orbiting electrons, transforming one of its protons into a neutron. Then it is 7Li, a stable isotope of lithium.
Among other 7Be atoms, a sample of 7Be needs about 53.3 days for half of it to become 7Li. Inside a buckyball cage, this half-life is only 52.5 days.
It should be noted that the half-life for 7Be alone was taken at room temperature while the trapped 7Be was measured at about -450°F (-268°C if you’re outside the US and 5K if you’re savvy). In any case, the trapped beryllium was pretty darn cold, only slightly warmer than absolute zero.
At first, I wondered if the temperature difference accounted for the difference in half-lives. However, it seems that the half-life of the cold 7Be should be longer than its warm counterpart, not shorter. Feel free to share your thoughts.
As interesting as this half-life business is, what really drew me to this research was the question how did they get a beryllium-7 atom into a buckyball?.
First, they had to make 7Be, and they did this by shooting protons at lithium carbonate. The lithium will catch the proton and kick out a neutron. The newly formed 7Be has some extra energy, so it uses some of that up before it “penetrates into the C60 cage.”b
Apparently it just walks right in and doesn’t walk back out again. There was also mention of an electron changing hands (from the beryllium to the buckyball), so perhaps that’s enough to keep the beryllium inside. I’ll be sure to update if I get a better explanation.
a T Ohtsuki et al. “Radioactive decay speed-up at T=5K: The electron-capture decay rate of 7Be encapsulated in C60.” Submitted to Physical Review Letters.
b T. Ohtsuki et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3522 (1996).
…Buckminster. It must have been awful for him, back in the third grade.
Read the rest of the post . . .
Posted by alpinekat at 3:42 PM 4 comments Links to this post
Acoustics and Monstropolis
As we speak (well, I write and you read), Salt Lake City is buzzing with acoustical news. It’s home to one of this year’s Acoustical Society of America meetings.
The meeting covers topics from What Did Dinosaurs Hear? to a Workspace Speech Privacy Calculator. And where else can you hear legitimate scientific talks titled Is a Neolithic Burial Chamber Different from My Bathroom? and Life’s a Pitch?
Science Daily had an interesting story, cleverly titled A Sound Way to Turn Heat into Electricity, about some research that will be presented at the meeting tomorrow. This research surrounds using sound to turn waste heat into electricity. The University of Utah physicists use hot, moving air to produce sound in a small resonator. The sound waves then squeeze a piezoelectric device, and shazam- you have electricity.
The Army is interested in this work because they could use the technology to make use of waste heat from radars and to create portable electrical energy generators that could power electronics on the battlefield. You can imagine how else it might be useful – Dr. Orest Symko, the lead researcher, thinks the technology could make efficient cooling systems for computers and generate electricity from the heat give off by nuclear power plant cooling towers.
Cool stuff! Sort of reminds me of Monstropolis, the city in Monsters Inc. powered by the screams of children…
Read the rest of the post . . .
Posted by spacekendra at 10:55 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Tuesday, June 05, 2007
Hi, my name is Meagan and I’m the new person
Hello, I am an amateur blogger so here I go!
My name is Meagan and I am from Houston, Texas. I am a senior at Angelo State University in San Angelo, Texas, Home of the Running Rams!
I am the 2007 APS Physics Quest Intern. I hope to share some of my interesting findings along the way!
-NP007
Read the rest of the post . . .
Posted by Meagans at 1:44 PM 1 comments Links to this post
Monday, June 04, 2007
Science Fiction takes on Homeland Security
“We’re well-qualified nuts.”
This is how author Jerry Pournelle described the members of Sigma, a group of science fiction writers organized to advise government officials ( USA Today article).
The six writers that make up Sigma took part in a recent Homeland Security conference on science and technology. They were invited because the Homeland Security Department thinks their vivid imaginations and crazy ideas about possible terrorist attacks and detection systems might give them a leg up when it comes to anticipating attacks.
An interesting idea – after all most security systems (at least the airport’s) seem reactive rather than far-sighted. But being involved in this type of activity brings up another matter that scientists have long struggled with: social responsibility.
Scientists from Alfred Nobel to J. Robert Oppenheimer (and MANY others) have struggled with the implications of their work. Knowledge, after all, is power. And the whole system of science is based on pursuing and sharing knowledge. Where does personal responsibility begin and end?
Natural Search Blog had this to say about the writers:
…One would wish that they had learned the lessons of scientists and engineers of the past who later saw that the willy-nilly deployment of new technologies could cause more destruction and problems for the human race, sometimes outweighing the improvements they originally intended.
On the other hand, science fiction author and Sigma member Larry Niven says this about why they are helping the government:
To save civilization. We do it in fiction. Why wouldn’t we want to do it in fact?
Sigh. Too much to think about for a Monday.