# Rescaled Jacobi amplitude – general solution for the mathematical pendulum

Jacobi amplitude function appeared yesterday in the episode Derivatives of Jacobi elliptic am, sn, cn, dn. We have derived a beautiful simple differential equation satisfied by this beautiful function (1) Today we will see that, after rescaling, this is a perfect fabric for making the nonlinear outfit for the mathematical pendulum.
Wikipedia has smart animations showing pendulum’s motion for different kinetic energies, for instance Initial angle of 45° Pendulum with enough energy for a full swing.
It has also another little animation showing the angle avrying with time. But this last picture is not well adapted for a pendulum that is making full swings around the circle. Therefore I will refer to the picture that I was already using in The case of the swinging pendulum: This last picture has many more features depicted than I will need. I will need only the angles and and the length of the pendulum . The mass of the swinging point P I will denote by . Usually it is denoted by but we will use for the square of the modulus of the Jacobi amplitude function For solving our pendulum problem we will only need conservation of energy.

When the pendulum swings, the angle changes with time We will use the dot to denote time derivative of  The linear velocity of the pendulum is , therefore the kinetic energy is For the potential energy we will choose the zero of the potential at the bottom, Denoting by the height of the mass with respect to the lowest level, we have For we have for we have Here it is useful to introduce the half-angle We know from trigonometry that Therefore

(2) Potential energy is that is

(3) Maximum kinetic energy is at the bottom, for . At this point we have also minimum potential energy, since at the point. Maximal potential energy is at the top: The character of the motion will depend on the ratio When this ratio is there will be not enough kinetic energy to rise the swinging mass to the top, and the pendulum will oscillate back and forth. But when the ratio then
even at the top the mass will have a nonzero speed, and the pendulum will be making full circles. We denote this important ratio by  Thus

(4) We now write the conservation of energy equation: On the left we have total energy at time On the right we have total energy at the bottom, when there is only kinetic energy. Substituting the with the corresponding expressions derived above we get

(5) Now, therefore We also introduce defined as

(6) This is the expression for the standard angular frequency for a linear pendulum, fo small oscillations.

With all these substitutions and simplifications Eq. (5) can be written in the following form:

(7) The last equation is almost identical with the equation (1) satisfied by the amplitude function, except for the coefficient in front of on the left. But this can be easily accomodated by changing the time scale. With we notice that Comparing with Eq. (7) we see that the solution of the pendulum equation is

(8) and therefore

(9) .

In the next post we will look closer at this solution and try to understand its meaning.

## 4 thoughts on “Rescaled Jacobi amplitude – general solution for the mathematical pendulum”

1. Ronan says:

.
I hope copy and paste of Latex works. I tried doing it this way. Solving Angular acceleration =-K sin(Theta)

{\frac {{\rm d}^{2}}{{\rm d}{t}^{2}}}\Theta \left( t \right) =-{\omega
_{{o}}}^{2}\sin \left( \Theta \left( t \right) \right)
and the solution maple gave was
\int ^{\Theta \left( t \right) }\!{\frac {1}{\sqrt {2\,{\omega_{{0}}}^
{2}\cos \left( {\it \_a} \right) +{\it \_C1}}}}{d{\it \_a}}-t-{\it
\_C2}=0
This seems to be along the lines of Jacobi functions. How would I transform this?

2. Bjab says:

Erratum

In (5) m should be in denominator

In (7a) k and t reversed

In (7a) and (8) and (9) am has only one argument

3. arkajad says:

@Bjab – Thanks for the erratum. Fixed.

@Ronan – You can make latex to work in comments if you start your comment with “latexpage” in square braces, like here Detailed instructions here

And yes, the formula for the solution given by Maple can be converted into the formula from my post. The constant C2 is for shifting the zero of time (I have it set to 0). The constant C1 relates to m.

4. Ronan says:

{\omega_{{0}}}^{2}={\frac {g}{l}}

\int ^{\Theta \left( t \right) }\!{\frac {1}{\sqrt {2\,{\omega_{{0}}}^
{2}\cos \left( \Theta \right) +{\it \_C1}}}}{d\Theta}-t-{\it \_C2}=0

I did type letexpage in the square brackets. I tested these on http://quicklatex,com and they rendered.I am using internet explorer on win 7.I don’t really see been able to type a meaningful formula in latex.