Let me recall the particular trajectory that we are discussing. In fact the particular part of this particular trajectory where the flip occurs.

Click on the image to open gif animation. It will take time to load as it is 2.5 MB.

The flip is much like one of these flips that Russian cosmonaut Dzhanibekov observed in zero gravity, and was very much perplexed by the phenomenon.

We are investigating the jungle of math that we have to apply in order to simulate such a behavior of an ideal Platonic rigid body. At present we are analyzing the special conditions when only one flip happens. Apart of a rather short (as compared to eternity) period of time when the flip occurs, the body rotates uniformly about its middle axis. Its trajectory in the rotation group, represented by quaternions of unit norm, follows a circle. One circle before flip, another circle after the flip.

In this note I am taking a close look at these two circles. Can we find their exact coordinate representation in 3D after stereographic projection?

Yes, we can, and we will do it now.

We use the formulas from Meeting with remarkable circles.

For the body of our choice, with moments of inertia and on the trajectory where the constants that enter the solution have values

(1)

In the solution of the Euler’s equations we have functions and

(2)

with

Here are the plots of these functions:

For we have smaller than and for smaller than We can consider it being zero for all practical purposes.

As for it becomes practically constant and equal 1 for and for

We then have the function

(3)

Again for all practical purposes for we have

(4)

and for

(5)

Let us substitute these formulas into the solution for

(6)

We obtain

(7)

The upper signs concern the lower signs concern

In stereographic projection we are plotting divided by We see that the “future circle” is in the plane while the past circle in the orthogonal plane

I did my geometric exercises and I have found that “the future circle” has origin at while “the past circle” has the origin at Both circles have radius

So, we have complete information about these “circles of eternal return”.

One more comment: in Another geodesic line I was showing what I thought was a subtle structure of the trajectory approaching the circle:

But now I know that it was a numerical artefact. As noticed in today’s post, for computer will see only one line, no fine structure. To be sure I asked my computer to take more points on the plot (100000 instead of 10000) and all the fine structure disappeared.