# The mysterious paths on the three-sphere

Wherever you are, whatever you do, there is a certain special direction that takes you out of the infinite labyrinth, and leads to the reincarnation cycle getting closer and closer to the ideal path. Ordinary people do not know about it. Warriors do know.

Beyond a certain point there is no return. This point has to be reached.
Franz Kafka

I am discussing geodesic lines on the three-sphere, geodesics of the left-invariant metric determined by asymmetric rigid body. There is a special, very special class of geodesics there. At every point there is a special direction. If you start the geodesic in this special direction – it has, at both ends, in the future and in the past – a limit cycle/circle. Enough esoteric talk. Let’s go to the math. The following math describes one such geodesic line. Other are obtained by left translations. are moments of inertia of our rigid body, ordered as We define

(1) Define:

(2) where Define

(3) Define:

(4) The story is this. The body can rotate uniformly about its middle axis forever. Either left or right. These are two circles in the rotation group that, using its double cover, topologically is Stereographic projection maps circles into circles. So they become two circles in These circles: But there is another possibility, when this uniform rotation along the middle axis is only asymptotic. It happens in the infinite past and in the infinite future. But only approximately with the real life, and excluding the short metamorphosis period. This is the trajectory described by the formulas above. Here is the trajectory for time t from to : And here is this trajectory together with asymptotic circles. Here the red circle is for the bad past, the blue circle, for the good future. Under microscope it reveals rich structure – infinite mystery. ## 2 thoughts on “The mysterious paths on the three-sphere”

1. Ronan says:

psi(t)is given as But in this case L =1 You now have 2 infront of the arctan and inside tanh evaluated differently.
The above then evaluated to I know I could have misduplicated something.
Edit:- corrected something and the Latex messed up.

1. arkajad says:

There was indeed a mistake. In the argument of arctan I put square root of 3 instead of a general expression valid for other choices of I1,I2,I3 than just 1,2,3.
Now I introduced a new constant delta, verified and it is ok even if it looks strange. Will explain it in the new post.